![]() |   | Periodic editorials concerning everything from the very worst industryfrom an annual report standpoint, that isto what's wrong with the Fourth Estate. Reporters who can't hit an accuracy with a cannon. |
|
Sid discusses a variety of annual report-related issues, not least, the number of 2003 books he obtained "over the transom."
From Curtiss-Wright to Vulcan Materials they camecompanies' year-ago annuals, which weren't sent us. Their 2003 books weren't proudly proclaimedby companies, I suspect, who hoped and prayed Mr. Annual Report wouldn't get his hands on theirs. And, proving my impartiality, one or two either warranted high marks if not favorable mention. It also struck me as odd that two of the companiesWalgreen and Hormel Foodswhose books warranted praise didn't respond to inquiries as to who should receive credit for shepherding to fruition their companies' books. Not surprisingly, since her track record is exceptional, Tyson Foods' Julie Kegley again hit the heightsthat is, shepherded a book that once again warranted the sobriquet, "world-class," by scoring at least 100 of a potential 135 points. Pleasantly surprising is how well the Hormel and Walgreen's books did with anonymous helmsmen (or, I suppose, women). What also surprised is the number of companies that didn't submit (gratis, of course) their year-ago bookstwo dozen of them, at least, it turns out. We have them, courtesy of the Wall Street Journal and its annual report service. So history likely will be rewrittenthat is, the results previously quoted I suspect will turn out to be unduly positive. Meaning: A quick once-over indicates that none of the no-shows knocked my socks off. I'll let you know if I'm wrong. Sad.
|
| << Back to the Soapbox Main Page |
|
|
|